Labels

2010 State of the Union (1) ABC News (2) Abubakar Siddique (1) Affirmative action (1) Afghanistan (2) Africa (1) Agence France-Presse (1) AlterNet (1) Anton Chekhov (1) Arizona (2) Arms control (1) Arnold Schwarzenegger (1) Asia (1) Atul Gawande (1) Barack Obama (4) Barnett Rubin (1) BBC (1) Blogs (4) CBS News (1) Civil and political rights (2) Civil rights movement (1) CNN (2) Cook Political Report (1) Daily Show (1) Daniel Hernández (1) David Valesky (1) Dean Skelos (1) Democratic (1) Democratic Party (1) Democratic Party (United States) (2) Detroit (1) Diane Savino (1) Egypt (1) Election Day (1) Energy and Environment (1) Fabian Núñez (1) Federal Bureau of Investigation (1) Federal holidays in the United States (1) Gabrielle Gifford (1) Gabrielle Giffords (3) George W. Bush (2) Governor of California (1) Health care reform (1) Healthcare Reform (1) History (2) Hollywood (1) Hosni Mubarak (1) Huffington Post (2) Jeff Klein (1) Jimmy Carter (1) Joe Biden (1) Joe Louis Arena (1) Jon Stewart (1) Kabul (1) King-Martin Luther (1) Links (1) Marsy's Law (1) Martin Luther King Jr (1) Martin Luther King Jr. Day (1) Medicare (2) Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (1) Mike Huckabee (1) Mike Rogers (1) Mitt Romney (1) Mohamed ElBaradei (1) MSNBC (3) National Defense University (1) NATO (1) Nazism (1) New Hampshire (1) New START (1) New York City (1) New York Observer (1) New York State Senate (1) New York Times (1) News (2) Newt Gingrich (1) Oklahoma Senate (1) Pakistan (1) PoliticalWire (1) Politician (1) Politics (1) Politics Daily (1) President (1) President of the United States (1) Public Broadcasting Service (1) Rand Paul (1) RealClearPolitics (1) Republican (5) Republican Party (United States) (2) Republicans (1) Ron Paul (1) Rudy Giuliani (1) Russia (1) Russian language (1) Sacramento County Superior Court (1) San Diego State University (1) Sarah Palin (3) September 11 attacks (1) Social Security (1) Staten Island (1) Steve Cohen (1) Taliban (1) TechCrunch (1) The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right (1) The Wall Street Journal (1) Tucson Arizona (1) Twitter (1) United States (10) United States Congress (1) United States Department of Justice (1) United States Department of State (1) United States Senate (2) US News and World Report (1) USA Patriot Act (1) Zbigniew Brzezinski (1)

Democracy Now!

CNN.com - Politics

BBC News - Politics

Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News

CNN.com - World

CNN.com - Video

Total Pageviews

Delicious

Search This Blog

Tweet Politics Blog

Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Bush political office overstepped limits, investigators say – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Bush political office overstepped limits, investigators say – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

Bush political office overstepped limits, investigators say
January 25th, 2011
05:03 PM ET
SHARE
Bush political office overstepped limits, investigators say
mug.cnn
Washington (CNN) - The Bush administration used a White House political office as a "boiler room" to support Republican congressional candidates in violation of federal law, a report released Monday by an independent government watchdog agency concludes.
The findings of the report by the Office of Special Counsel echo those of a 2008 House Oversight Committee investigation, which concluded that the activities of the Office of Political Affairs during the administration of President George W. Bush represented a "gross abuse of the public trust."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Arnold Schwarzenegger's apology letter angers victim's family | abc7news.com

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger spea...Image via WikipediaArnold Schwarzenegger's apology letter angers victim's family | abc7news.com

Schwarzenegger's apology letter angers victim's family

Wednesday, January 12, 2011
An explanation and an apology were issued in a letter from former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to the family of a murder victim, but it is only causing more pain for a Bay Area family. In it, the former governor explains why he commuted the sentence of a high-ranking politician's son.
Schwarzenegger said he was so sorry that the commutation of Esteban Nunez caused this family more pain. The family, though, calls this letter a public relations stunt, a joke, and damage control, and now they're talking about a lawsuit.
The letter begins, "Dear Mr. and Mrs. Santos, words cannot adequately express the sorrow in my heart for the loss of your son, Luis..."
If the letter was supposed to make Kathy Santos feel better, it has only made her more outraged.
It concludes, "Maria and I send our deepest condolences and heartfelt prayers. Most sincerely, Arnold Schwarzenegger."
The letter arrived at the family's Concord home over the weekend.
It is the first time Schwarzenegger reached out to the family since reducing the sentence of Nunez from 16 years for his role in the murder of Luis Santos down to seven. Nunez is the son of former Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez. It was one of Schwarzenegger's final moves before leaving office.
In the letter, the then-governor apologized for adding to the family's grief. He wrote, "But our system of justice demands that the facts of this case be weighed without the passion of a father's rage. And the facts of this case do not support equal sentences for both men."
"His facts are based on what Fabian told him. They have nothing to do with real fact," says Kathy Santos.
Schwarzenegger said Nunez did not personally stab Luis Santos, calling the sentence excessive.
"The commutation was strictly political corruption. That was those two guys in cahoots, Fabian and Schwarzenegger, trying to do a backdoor deal, and if they think that they're going to get away with it, they have a long thing coming," says Kathy.
She says her family's rights were violated; they should have been notified about the reduced sentence.
"In every state, and in the federal government, the executive has the power ofcommutation of sentence and that power is virtually unassailable in a court of law," says ABC7 legal analyst Dean Johnson.
In the letter, Schwarzenegger said, as a father, he knows no sentence is too harsh for the murder of Luis Santos -- a San Diego college student at the time -- but Kathy Santos calls it insincere.
"I just thought to myself, 'Wow, Fabian still got away with it. Even though he couldn't get away with it in the courts, he got away with it with his buddy," she says.
Instead of helping or providing comfort, Kathy Santos said the letter from Schwarzenegger actually made her pain even worse. The family says if they decide to sue, it will be because they believe their rights under the California Victims' Bill of Rights were violated.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, January 21, 2011

Jon Stewart, Democrat Steve Cohen compares GOP lies to NAZI lies

Citizens registered as an Independent, Democra...Image via WikipediaKick! Making Politics Fun - A liberal dose of political humor


Jon Stewart, Democrat Steve Cohen compares GOP lies to NAZI lies

Once again here we are with yet another false political equivalency in this rhetoric debate. Again the issue at play in Tuscon is not angry rhetoric, it is violent rhetoric.


Guns, lock and load, reload, gun sight targeting, 2nd Amendment remedies, graphics and videos of candidates with assault rifles which is in the realm of 100 to 1 Republicans to Democrats. 100 and 1 are not equal or the same or no different than each other.


Even the anger is one sided. The first year after Obama it was that endless parade of Republicans screaming and shoving at town hall meetings. Which was followed up the following year by the Tea Party and their racist signs, NAZI placards, bringing guns to political rallies and literally spitting on people. And the Left in all of that time? I can't come up with ONE THING other than the over reaction to TWO black guys looking menacing at a polling place, one with a stick who represented a group of a few hundred people. THIS IS NOT EQUAL!




The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon- Thurs 11p / 10cWord
Warcraft
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPoliticalHumor & Satire BlogThe Daily Show on Facebook


First off I would like to remind everyone that the most successful comparison ever made to NAZIS in American political discourse was from Republican Rush Limbaugh who renamed uppity women (Feminists), FEMINAZIS. In fact his ubiquitous use of the new word was so successful that it entered into not only common use in our cultural and political lexicon, but also into dictionaries and encyclopedias the world over.


Please understand its meaning, i.e., women fighting for the same rights as men are NAZIS. Accepted and embraced by not only the Republican Party but the media as well. For to complain about the WORD is to fall into the trap Rush Limbaugh and the GOP have so successfully laid a generation ago.


This is the double whammy they so easily won. If you complain about calling feminists NAZIS that is Political Correctness which is LIBERAL NAZISM. So successful a political game that Democrats had to drop the word "liberal" from usage. At the time it became known as the "L-Word" and subsequently morphed into "progressive". Kick! PC Pages


Secondly I would like to see a video collage of Republicans on the House floor comparing Democrats to the SOVIET UNION, STALIN, MARXISM, COMMUNISM and the GANG OF FOUR CULTURAL REVOLUTION. My guess would be thousands up against this ONE. In fact let's compare this same issue to just Glenn Beck alone for that matter.


And lastly, Mr. Stewart's argument is that having ONE THING in common with NAZISM - like precision marching - does not a NAZI make. That I can agree with, but bogus similarities aside let's list a few real commonalities held by both NAZIS and Republicans.


Nationalism
Militarism
Neo Con empire through war
Preemptive War
Anti-Immigration
Rounding up people for deportation
Flag waving
Anti-Union
Utter Whiteness
My Country Right or Wrong
Right-wing Radio Propaganda
War Rallies
Intolerance
Racism
Bigotry
Homophobia
Intimidation
Law and Order!
Largest prison system in the world
Anti-Communism
Murdering Jews
20 out of 21 is something to Heil about!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Taegan Goddard's Political Wire

PHOENIX, AZ - NOVEMBER 2:  Republican Represen...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeTaegan Goddard's Political Wire
Here we go again: Erin McPike reports the Arizona Republican Party "is preparing to pass a resolution Saturday that would bump its primary date to February, when traditional early states like Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and now, Nevada, will hold their nominating contests. The move could touch off a scramble for the early states to go even earlier."

The RNC "passed a new set of rules at its summer meeting in August that set up a tiered system for the primary process and would punish states that try to buck it. States other than the first four would suffer a penalty by holding contests before March 1, 2012. But the Arizona GOP is willing to suffer the consequences."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Poll Finds Wariness About Cutting Entitlements - NYTimes.com

Poll Finds Wariness About Cutting Entitlements - NYTimes.com

Poll Finds Wariness About Cutting Entitlements




9) »
As President Obama and Congress brace to battle over how to reduce chronic annual budget deficits, Americans overwhelmingly say that in general they prefer cutting government spending to paying higher taxes, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
Yet their preference for spending cuts, even in programs that benefit them, dissolves when they are presented with specific options related to Medicareand Social Security, the programs that directly touch the most people and also are the biggest drivers of the government’s projected long-term debt.
Nearly two-thirds of Americans choose higher payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security over reduced benefits in either program. And asked to choose among cuts to Medicare, Social Security or the nation’s third-largest spending program — the military — a majority by a large margin said cut the Pentagon.
While Americans are near-unanimous in calling deficits a problem — a “very serious” problem, say 7 out of 10 — a majority believes it should not be necessary for them to pay higher taxes to bridge the shortfall between what the government spends and what it takes in. But given a choice of often-discussed revenue options, they preferred a national sales tax or a limit in the deduction for mortgage interest to a higher gasoline tax or taxing employer-provided health benefits.
Americans’ sometimes contradictory impulses on spending and taxes suggest the political crosscurrents facing both parties as they gird for debate over how to address the fiscal woes of a nation with an aging population, a complex tax system and an accumulated debt that is starting to weigh on the economy.
On Thursday, a large group of House conservatives called for cutting $2.5 trillion in mostly unspecified spending over the next decade and House Republican leaders have vowed to make spending cuts a priority in coming months after winning a majority on that promise in November’s midterm elections. President Obama is expected to make fiscal responsibility a central theme of his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, and of the budget he will send Congress next month for the 2012 fiscal year, which starts Oct. 1.
The antitax sentiment reflected in the poll is in line with Republicans’ mantra that spending, not taxes, is the problem for the federal budget. Yet that assessment contradicts the conclusions of several bipartisan and academic panels that proposed debt-reduction plans over the past year.
Those groups — including, in November, a bipartisan majority of Mr. Obama’s fiscal commission — each concluded that the growth in the nation’s debt could not be reined in with spending cuts alone. They said the required reductions, including for Medicare and Social Security, would be deeper than anything the public would accept.
The poll of 1,036 adults nationwide, which has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points, was conducted Jan. 15 through 19 — in the days after Mr. Obama gave a widely praised address at a Tucson memorial service for those killed in theshooting rampage that wounded Representative Gabrielle Giffords, Democrat of Arizona. Nearly two-thirds of Americans approve of his response to the shooting, the poll showed; 11 percent disapprove.
National tragedies or crises often have a rallying-around effect that buoys a president’s public image. The poll, like others recently, shows Mr. Obama with a slightly improved approval rating. Nearly half of Americans, 49 percent, approve of his job performance, compared with 39 percent who do not.
The public also gives Mr. Obama the benefit of the doubt as he and Republicans adjust to their new power-sharing relationship. After a productive lame-duck session of Congress late last year, in which Mr. Obama won a number of concessions from Republicans in return for extending the Bush-era tax cuts on high incomes, the poll showed that nearly eight out of 10 Americans believe Mr. Obama will try to work with Republicans to get things done — including 77 percent of independents and 57 percent of Republicans. Less than half of all respondents — 46 percent — said Republicans will try to work with Mr. Obama.
The president holds no advantage over Republicans, however, on addressing the deficit and job creation. Americans split on whom they trust more to make the right decisions on both issues. The poll holds other warning signs for the president. With the unemployment rate remaining above 9 percent, majorities disapprove of his handling of the economy (52 percent), job creation (54 percent) and the deficit (56 percent).
Fewer people than ever think Mr. Obama has the same priorities for the country as they do: 52 percent say he does not share their priorities, down from 65 percent who said he did when Mr. Obama first took office.
Representative John A. Boehner, a Republican of Ohio who is the new House speaker, is relatively unknown to the national public; the roughly one-quarter who have an opinion of him are split between those with negative and positive views.
A far-better-known Republican, Sarah Palin, also is far more disliked. She is viewed unfavorably by 57 percent of the public, including a majority of independents — her highest negative rating ever in Times/CBS polls.
In a week that saw House Republicans vote to repeal Mr. Obama’s signature domestic achievement, the law overhauling the health care system, nearly half of Americans said the law should stand. About four in 10 people support repeal, but many say they want to undo only parts of the law.
Asked what Congress should focus on, 43 percent of Americans say job creation; health care is a distant second, cited by 18 percent, followed by deficit reduction, war and illegalimmigration.
If Medicare benefits have to be reduced, the most popular option is raising premiums on affluent beneficiaries. Similarly, if Social Security benefits must be changed to make the program more financially sound, a broad majority prefers the burden fall on the wealthy. Even most wealthy Americans agree.
As budget woes force a national debate over the country’s domestic priorities, preserving money for education ranks at the top for most Americans.
The poll showed that the Arizona shootings had not changed Americans’ general opposition to banning handguns. However, more than six in 10 favor a nationwide ban on assault weapons and on the kind of high-capacity magazine used in Tucson.

Megan Thee-Brenan and Marjorie Connelly contributed reporting.
Enhanced by Zemanta