Labels

2010 State of the Union (1) ABC News (2) Abubakar Siddique (1) Affirmative action (1) Afghanistan (2) Africa (1) Agence France-Presse (1) AlterNet (1) Anton Chekhov (1) Arizona (2) Arms control (1) Arnold Schwarzenegger (1) Asia (1) Atul Gawande (1) Barack Obama (4) Barnett Rubin (1) BBC (1) Blogs (4) CBS News (1) Civil and political rights (2) Civil rights movement (1) CNN (2) Cook Political Report (1) Daily Show (1) Daniel Hernández (1) David Valesky (1) Dean Skelos (1) Democratic (1) Democratic Party (1) Democratic Party (United States) (2) Detroit (1) Diane Savino (1) Egypt (1) Election Day (1) Energy and Environment (1) Fabian Núñez (1) Federal Bureau of Investigation (1) Federal holidays in the United States (1) Gabrielle Gifford (1) Gabrielle Giffords (3) George W. Bush (2) Governor of California (1) Health care reform (1) Healthcare Reform (1) History (2) Hollywood (1) Hosni Mubarak (1) Huffington Post (2) Jeff Klein (1) Jimmy Carter (1) Joe Biden (1) Joe Louis Arena (1) Jon Stewart (1) Kabul (1) King-Martin Luther (1) Links (1) Marsy's Law (1) Martin Luther King Jr (1) Martin Luther King Jr. Day (1) Medicare (2) Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (1) Mike Huckabee (1) Mike Rogers (1) Mitt Romney (1) Mohamed ElBaradei (1) MSNBC (3) National Defense University (1) NATO (1) Nazism (1) New Hampshire (1) New START (1) New York City (1) New York Observer (1) New York State Senate (1) New York Times (1) News (2) Newt Gingrich (1) Oklahoma Senate (1) Pakistan (1) PoliticalWire (1) Politician (1) Politics (1) Politics Daily (1) President (1) President of the United States (1) Public Broadcasting Service (1) Rand Paul (1) RealClearPolitics (1) Republican (5) Republican Party (United States) (2) Republicans (1) Ron Paul (1) Rudy Giuliani (1) Russia (1) Russian language (1) Sacramento County Superior Court (1) San Diego State University (1) Sarah Palin (3) September 11 attacks (1) Social Security (1) Staten Island (1) Steve Cohen (1) Taliban (1) TechCrunch (1) The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right (1) The Wall Street Journal (1) Tucson Arizona (1) Twitter (1) United States (10) United States Congress (1) United States Department of Justice (1) United States Department of State (1) United States Senate (2) US News and World Report (1) USA Patriot Act (1) Zbigniew Brzezinski (1)

Democracy Now!

CNN.com - Politics

BBC News - Politics

Democratic Underground Latest Breaking News

CNN.com - World

CNN.com - Video

Total Pageviews

Delicious

Search This Blog

Tweet Politics Blog

Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Republican Party (United States). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republican Party (United States). Show all posts

Friday, January 14, 2011

Crooks and Liars

Seal of the United States Department of JusticeImage via WikipediaCrooks and Liars


Via Raw Story, this unappetizing news that the Patriot Act is likely to be renewed for yet another year:
Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) has introduced a little-noticed bill that intends to once again renew controversial provisions of the Bush administration's USA Patriot Act that are due to expire this year.
When the act was first signed into law, Congress put in some "sunset" provisions to quiet the concerns of civil libertarians, but they were ignored by successive extensions. Unfortunately, those concerns proved to be well founded, and a 2008 Justice Department report confirmed that the FBI regularly abused their ability to obtain personal records of Americans without a warrant.
The only real sign of strong opposition to the act was in 2005, when a Democratic threat to filibuster its first renewal was overcome by Senate Republicans.
Since the bill introduced by Rogers on Jan. 5 was virtually identical to the extension passed last year, its passage was seen as likely.
"Given the very limited number of days Congress has in session before the current deadline, and the fact that the bill’s Republican sponsor is only seeking another year, I think it’s safe to read this as signaling an agreement across the aisle to put the issue off yet again," the conservative-leaning Cato Institute's Julian Sanchez wrote.
"In the absence of a major scandal, though, it’s hard to see why we should expect the incentives facing legislators to be vastly different a year from now," he added. "I’d love to be proven wrong, but I suspect this is how reining in the growth of the surveillance state becomes an item perpetually on next year’s agenda."
As senator, Obama promised to support reforming the Patriot Act, but voted in favor of extending it in 2005 and 2008. Similarly, he signed last year's extension into law with little fanfare. FBI and Department of Justice officials had consistently argued that restricting their blanket authority to conduct warrantless searches would harm national security.
Enhanced by Zemanta

What's Holding Up The Zadroga Bill? | The New York Observer

NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 20:  Joseph Zadroga (C...Image by Getty Images via @daylifeWhat's Holding Up The Zadroga Bill? | The New York Observer

What's Holding Up The Zadroga Bill?

December 21, 2010 | 4:02 p.m
To understand the depths of shame and cynicism in the partisan stalling of health legislation for 9/11 first responders, it is only necessary to recall how eagerly Republican politicians once rushed to identify themselves with New York City's finest and bravest. Nothing was easier, during the months and years that followed the terror attacks of September 2001, than to cloak oneself in the nobility of the police officers, firefighters, and construction workers who rushed to the smoking ruins - and the leaders of the Republican Party never hesitated to use them and the city as symbols, culminating in the party's 2004 national convention in Manhattan.
Unfortunately for those heroes, they are no longer so fashionable in right-wing circles and neither is their hometown. Even as they suffer from the cancers and pulmonary illnesses that have beset them as a result of their service, they are seem to be scorned among conservatives in Congress as just another "special interest" seeking a new "entitlement."
If only the first responders had asked for help back when they were still useful as political props! (And not merely as partisan hostages to help preserve the Bush tax cuts for the GOP's wealthiest patrons.)
The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, named for a police officer who died from a respiratory disease in 2006, has been in the works for several years - which means that Republican leaders have had many, many opportunities to improve what ought to have been a bipartisan measure from the beginning. Instead, they dishonestly complained about the bill suddenly appearing in the last hours of the lame-duck session. Actually there have been hours of hearings on how best to provide care and funding, and the Democratic sponsors have made every effort to ensure that this legislation is carefully crafted, both fiscally and programmatically. It is capped at less than $7 billion, will sunset in a decade, and sets forth strict guidelines for providing benefits.
So what is the real Republican objection to the Zadroga bill? That isn't clear, because almost none of the GOP Senators who unanimously blocked a vote on the bill has had the courage to explain his or her position on the Senate floor or on television. Their propensity for posturing on the deficit is one possibility; another is their poisonous attitude toward unionized public servants, a category that includes police and firefighters as well as teachers and postal workers. Or perhaps they dislike the bill's financing via closure of a corporate tax loophole, which has provoked howls of protest from the Chamber of Commerce.
Conservative politicians still remain quick to exploit raw emotion over 9/11 when the opportunity presents itself, as in the debate over the Islamic community center proposed for a site in lower Manhattan. The hallowed Ground Zero is sacred to every American, according to the blowhards who indulged in those cheap anti-Muslim rants - but the suffering and dying who hurried there in the hours of danger must now fend for themselves.
Certain Republicans bear considerable responsibility for ensuring the passage of this legislation, and very few of them have stepped up. Rudolph Giuliani spoke out briefly in favor of the bill, but "Mayor 9/11" ought to have lobbied his party's Senators far more vigorously - in person if necessary. What about George W. Bush, whose best-selling presidential memoir dwells at length on his own jut-jawed version of his role in 9/11 history?
To abandon those whom we so rightly venerated is to bring permanent dishonor on the entire nation. Why would the Republicans want to stain themselves with this indelible disgrace?
Enhanced by Zemanta